For CFOs, founders, and the advisors who serve them
CFO Curated. AI Refined.
Decades of CFO experience, amplified by agentic AI. Charts, Graphs and KPIs delivered the way you want them.
Curated KPIs and Visualizations
CFO-honed KPIs and data visualizations. Your accounting software is terrible at data visualizations. We fixed that.
Revenue
$1,860,000
▲ $120,000 · 6.9% favorable
$1,740,000 previous month
Gross profit
$1,097,400
▲ $88,200 · 8.7% favorable
$1,009,200 previous month
Operating profit
$279,000
▲ $52,800 · 23.3% favorable
$226,200 previous month
Cash at bank
$2,486,000
▲ $176,000 · 7.6% favorable
$2,310,000 previous month
Revenue — last 12 periods
$1,860,000Latest month
Operating expense category distribution
$818,400Operating expenses
Share of operating expense
- People & benefits$392,800 · 48%
- Sales & marketing$163,700 · 20%
- Product & technology$130,900 · 16%
- General & admin$81,800 · 10%
- Facilities & occupancy$49,200 · 6%
VTO — three-year plan against actual
$20,950,000Year three target · 2026
▼ $30,000 · 0.6% behind plan in Q2 2026, the latest closed quarter
VTO — the Vision/Traction Organizer — is judged on one number: revenue in the final year. Two quarters into 2026, $9,420,000 against $9,900,000 planned.
Revenue contribution & mix by business unit
$1,860,000July total
Every detail was chosen by CFOs with decades of experience running reviews like these. Our results are curated by CFOs and CEOs — not generated by developers.
Every Account, Every Period, Total Recall
A single CFO has one lifetime of experience and only so much memory to draw from. A diverse bench of CFOs is rarely feasible. Kalends runs AI agents in parallel, scales them across every account and period, and retains the full history—bringing your business more perspectives, more review capacity, and total recall.
Detect
Rules scan every account and period before any agent sees the ledger.
Consensus reached · five independent seats · 99.4% confidence
Latest verified insights
July period · five findings ratified
Every finding below came out of the agent consensus model. Five independent seats read the same exceptions, the validation gate dropped what could not be sourced, and only ratified findings are printed here.
Gross margin
59.0%
▲ 1.0 pt favorable
The gain is mix, not price — the higher-margin line grew fastest in the book.
Traced to four journal entries in cost of revenue
Ratified
Operating margin
15.0%
▲ 2.0 pt favorable
Operating profit grew 23.3% on 6.9% more revenue — 3.4× the leverage.
Operating expense rose $35,400 against $120,000 of new revenue
Ratified
Cash at bank
$2,486,000
▲ $176,000 favorable
The whole increase is collections — no financing moved this period.
Reconciled against the bank feed and the receivables subledger
Ratified
Customer concentration
23.6%
● threshold crossed
One customer now carries $438,960 of the month.
The concentration threshold is set at 20% of revenue
Ratified
Year three pace
4.8%
▼ $480,000 behind plan
Two quarters into the final year, revenue is $480,000 short of the pace the $20,950,000 target needs, though the quarterly gap has closed from 17.3% to 0.6%.
Q1 and Q2 2026 closed at $9,420,000 against $9,900,000 planned
Ratified
Tools Where You Want Them
The review goes where the work already happens — the inbox you open first, and the chat client you keep open all day.
It arrives in your inbox
The period review is written the way a CFO writes one: the figures that moved, what moved them, and where each came from. Four headline numbers, the twelve-period trend, and the three findings that matter, in the order they matter.
July · period closed
July review: revenue $1,860,000, up 6.9% on June
Revenue
$1,860,000
▲ 6.9% favorable
Gross profit
$1,097,400
▲ 8.7% favorable
Operating profit
$279,000
▲ 23.3% favorable
Cash at bank
$2,486,000
▲ 7.6% favorable
Revenue — last 12 periods
Revenue is $480,000 behind the year-three plan with two quarters closed.
Q1 and Q2 2026 at $9,420,000 against $9,900,000 planned
One customer now carries 23.6% of revenue — the first time that threshold has been crossed.
The concentration threshold is set at 20% of revenue
Gross margin improved 1.0 point to 59.0% — mix, not price.
Traced to four journal entries in cost of revenue
Three things to raise, in the order they matter.
Sent when the period closes.
Or you ask it questions where you already work
Kalends answers from the same ratified review, inside the chat client you already have open. Ask for the period, ask for trailing twelve months, and the visual comes back as an artifact rather than a paragraph.
Claude — July period review
Pull my July review from Kalends and show me TTM revenue and EBITDA.

- ◆Kalends monthly_review
- ◆Kalends ttm_series
July revenue was $1,860,000, up 6.9% on June, and gross margin improved 1.0 point to 59.0% on mix rather than price. Across the trailing twelve months revenue is $17,870,000 and EBITDA $2,388,000 — a 13.4% margin, against 11.0% a year ago.
TTM revenue and EBITDA · artifact
Kalends
Revenue and EBITDA, August to July
TTM revenue
$17,870,000
TTM EBITDA
$2,388,000
EBITDA margin
13.4%
Planned delivery channel — the Kalends MCP server is not live yet.
Coming soon integrations



Get Early Access
Kalends is pre-launch. Leave an address and we will write when there is something worth showing you.